Reverse Engineering CAD Engineering Services
3D CAD Design Services
15 years of experience
3D CAD Design Services
Are you looking for high-quality and accurate 3D CAD design services for your next project? Look no further! Our team of experienced CAD specialists is here to help you bring your designs to life. We offer a wide range of CAD design services, including 3D modeling, 2D drafting, conversion, and migration services. Our CAD design process is transparent, efficient, and collaborative. We work closely with our clients to understand their requirements, and we provide regular updates throughout the design process to ensure that the final designs meet their expectations. Our process includes an initial consultation, project scope and proposal, design phase, quality control and review, and delivery and support. With our CAD design services, we can assure you of working with experienced CAD specialists who deliver quality work on time and at a competitive price.
Bring Your Designs to Life with Professional 3D CAD Design Services
Are you looking for high-quality and accurate 3D CAD design services for your next project? Look no further! Our team of experienced CAD specialists is here to help you bring your designs to life. We offer a wide range of CAD design services, including 3D modeling, 2D drafting, conversion, and migration services. Our CAD design process is transparent, efficient, and collaborative. We work closely with our clients to understand their requirements, and we provide regular updates throughout the design process to ensure that the final designs meet their expectations. Our process includes an initial consultation, project scope and proposal, design phase, quality control and review, and delivery and support. With our CAD design services, we can assure you of working with experienced CAD specialists who deliver quality work on time and at a competitive price
We Offer
A Wide Range Of Services To Meet The Needs Of Our Clients
3D CAD Modeling Services
Our CAD specialists have extensive experience in building 3D models, ranging from simple designs to complex assemblies, using a variety of software tools such as NX, Solid Edge, SolidWorks, Creo, Autodesk Inventor, CATIA, and more. We work closely with our clients to understand their requirements and provide accurate 3D models that meet their needs.
2D Drafting Services
We understand the importance of accurate 2D drafting in the CAD design process, and we offer drafting services that cover all your needs. Our drafting services include converting your paper drawings and blueprints to digital formats, creating 2D drawings from 3D models, and drafting services for files from other CAD software platforms. We use industry-standard software tools such as AutoCAD and SolidWorks to create accurate and unambiguous 2D drawings that convey all the required information to the manufacturer.
Conversion and Migration Services
We understand that many companies have legacy data in various file formats, and we offer conversion and migration services to help you move your data to a more modern platform. Our conversion and migration services can cover all your paper drawings, blueprints, and even files from other CAD software platforms. We can convert files to and from various formats, ensuring that you can work with your data in the software tools of your choice. We also offer additional services such as rendering and simulation, product design and development, reverse engineering, and more. Our team of CAD specialists has extensive experience in a wide range of industries, including aerospace, automotive, consumer products, and medical devices, among others. We pride ourselves on providing quality work, timely delivery, and competitive pricing to ensure customer satisfaction.
Request a Demo For Operational Excellence
Listed below are the services
we offer our clients
- Surface and Solid modeling
-
Conversion of 2D drawings to 3D model in STEP/IGES
- Parametric 3D models in NX, Solid Edge, Solid Works, Inventor, Pro-E
- 2D details from 2D Assemblies or vice-versa
- Paper designs to 2D or 3D
- 3D to 2D conversion
- PDF to DWG conversion
- Corrections to exiting 2D drafts involving standards change in materials used and manufacturing details
- 2D exploded views of an assembly Engineering Change Request (ECR)
- Migration from one CAD platform to another CAD platform
- Conversion of legacy 2D CAD files such as Pro-E 2D to 2D AutoCAD DWG/DXF drawings
Benefits Of Working With Our Cad Design Services
- Experienced CAD Specialists
- Quality Work
- Timely Delivery
- Competitive Pricing
- Customer Satisfaction Guarantee
How It Works
- Initial Consultation
- Project Scope and Proposal
- Design Phase
- Quality Control and Review
- Delivery and Support
Benefits Of Working With Our Cad Design Services
How It Works
TESTIMONIALS
What People Say
What kind of industries do you work with?
Our CAD design services are suitable for a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, automotive, aerospace, defense, architecture, and many others. We have experience in creating 3D models and 2D drawings for various products, components, and systems.
What software tools do you use for CAD design?
Our team of CAD specialists has expertise in using a variety of software tools, including NX, Solid Edge, SolidWorks, Creo, Autodesk Inventor, CATIA, and more. We can work with the software tools of your choice.
Can you work with my existing paper drawings or blueprints?
Yes, we offer conversion and migration services that can cover all your paper drawings, blueprints, and even files from other CAD software platforms. We can convert your paper drawings or blueprints into 3D models and 2D drawings that are accurate and high quality.
How long does it take to complete a CAD design project?
The timeline for a CAD design project depends on the complexity of the project, the scope of work, and the number of revisions required. We will provide you with a timeline estimate during the initial consultation phase.
Can I request changes or revisions to the CAD designs?
Yes, we encourage our clients to provide feedback and request changes or revisions to the designs throughout the design process. We will work closely with you to ensure that the final designs meet your requirements and expectations.
How do you ensure the accuracy and quality of the CAD designs?
We have a rigorous quality control and review process that includes multiple checks and tests to ensure the accuracy and quality of the CAD designs. Our team of CAD specialists also has extensive experience in creating 3D models and 2D drawings that are precise and reliable.
Do you provide CAD design services for prototypes or small production runs?
Yes, we offer CAD design services for both prototypes and small production runs. Our team can work with you to design and create 3D models and 2D drawings that are optimized for manufacturing and production.
Can you sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) to protect my intellectual property?
Yes, we are committed to protecting the confidentiality and intellectual property of our clients. We are happy to sign an NDA or any other legal agreements that are required to ensure the protection of your information and designs.
What types of files can you deliver for the final CAD designs?
We can deliver the final CAD designs in a variety of file formats, including IGES, STEP, STL, PDF, and others. We will work with you to determine the best file format for your specific needs and requirements.
Featured Posts
AI Agent Development Company & IoT: Creating Intelligent Ecosystems
Your PLM system should evolve with your business not trap it in place. Yet countless manufacturers discover this truth too late, when a seemingly simple software upgrade becomes a six-month ordeal requiring extensive code rewrites and threatening business continuity. The difference between configurable and customized PLM isn’t just technical semantics. It’s the difference between a system that grows with you and one that eventually holds you hostage. The Upgrade Lock-in Problem: A Growing Crisis Every year, PLM vendors release new versions packed with enhanced capabilities, security patches, and modern integrations. Your competitors adopt these improvements quickly, gaining efficiency advantages. Meanwhile, your team receives the dreaded news: “Our customizations aren’t compatible with the new version. Upgrading will take 8-12 months and cost $500,000.” This scenario plays out across manufacturing with alarming frequency. Companies invest heavily in PLM systems, customize them extensively to meet specific requirements, and then discover they’ve created upgrade barriers that grow more expensive with each passing version. The financial impact compounds over time: Beyond dollars, upgrade lock-in creates operational paralysis. Teams hesitate to modify processes because changes might complicate future upgrades. Innovation stalls. Business agility suffers. The system that should enable growth becomes a constraint. Why Heavy Customization Creates Technical Debt Understanding why PLM customization leads to upgrade lock-in req uires examining how customizations interact with core system architecture. When vendors release new versions, they modify underlying code, databases, and APIs. Extensive customizations built on the old foundation often break catastrophically. Core modifications are the biggest culprit. When customizations alter fundamental PLM objects, workflows, or data models, they create fragile dependencies. A vendor’s structural change can cascade through dozens of custom modules, requiring complete rewrites. Custom code lacks vendor support. During upgrades, vendors test and validate their standard functionality. Your custom code? That’s entirely your responsibility to fix, test, and validate. This burden grows exponentially with customization complexity. Integration points multiply maintenance. Custom integrations with ERP, CAD, and other systems often rely on specific API versions. Vendor upgrades frequently deprecate old APIs, forcing integration rewrites alongside core customization updates. Documentation gaps compound problems. Custom code written years ago by departed developers becomes a black box. Without proper documentation, even simple customization updates consume weeks of reverse-engineering effort during PLM implementation upgrades. The irony? Most heavy customizations address requirements that configurable solutions could have handled with proper PLM implementation planning. Configurable PLM: Built-in Flexibility Without the Baggage Modern configurable PLM platforms deliver extensive flexibility through vendor-supported mechanisms designed to survive upgrades. Understanding these capabilities transforms how manufacturers approach PLM customization decisions. Configuration tools provide powerful adaptation: These configuration capabilities handle 80-90% of typical “customization” requirements. The critical difference? Configurations remain vendor-supported through upgrades. The vendor tests configuration compatibility, provides migration tools, and ensures configurations survive version transitions. The upgrade advantage is transformative: Strategic PLM implementation leverages configuration first, reserving true customization for genuinely unique requirements that configuration cannot address. The Smart Customization Strategy: When and How to Customize Eliminating all PLM customization isn’t realistic or advisable. Some requirements genuinely exceed configuration capabilities. The key is distinguishing necessary customization from premature customization and implementing it with upgrade survivability in mind. Reserve customization for these scenarios: When customization is necessary, follow upgrade-friendly principles: Build through extensibility frameworks. Modern PLM platforms provide custom development frameworks designed for upgrade compatibility. These frameworks offer hooks, events, and APIs that remain stable across versions, allowing customizations to survive upgrades with minimal modification. Maintain strict separation from core code. Never modify vendor-supplied objects, workflows, or data models directly. Build separate custom modules that interact with the core through supported interfaces. This isolation prevents vendor changes from breaking your customizations. Document obsessively with future developers in mind. Every customization needs comprehensive documentation explaining business requirements, technical implementation, dependencies, and testing procedures. Future upgrade teams will thank you. Version control everything. Maintain complete revision history of all custom code, configurations, and documentation. This enables rapid assessment of what changed between versions and expedites upgrade testing. Plan upgrade testing from day one. Design customizations with testability in mind. Maintain automated test suites covering all custom functionality. This dramatically reduces validation time during actual upgrades. Thoughtful PLM customization balances current needs with long-term flexibility, ensuring your investment supports rather than constrains future growth. Implementation Strategy: Getting It Right From the Start The most effective time to prevent upgrade lock-in is during initial PLM implementation. Decisions made during deployment establish patterns that persist for years. Following a configuration-first methodology protects long-term flexibility while meeting immediate requirements. Phase 1: Requirements Analysis with Configuration Mapping Before writing a single line of custom code, exhaustively explore configuration capabilities: Many “must-have customizations” evaporate when configuration capabilities are fully understood and business processes adapt modestly. Phase 2: Configuration-First Implementation Implement all configuration-addressable requirements first: This approach delivers immediate value while maintaining upgrade flexibility. Teams gain experience with configuration tools, often discovering additional standard solutions for perceived customization needs. Phase 3: Selective, Strategic Customization For requirements genuinely exceeding configuration capabilities, implement minimal, focused customizations: Phase 4: Ongoing Governance Establish rigorous change management processes: Strong governance prevents customization creep that gradually recreates upgrade lock-in despite initial discipline. Moving Forward: Breaking Free from Lock-in If you’re already locked into a heavily customized PLM system, the path forward requires honest assessment and strategic action. Continuing with the status quo only deepens the problem as technical debt compounds with each postponed upgrade. Assessment starts with inventory: Remediation follows multiple paths: Some organizations undertake phased “de-customization” projects, systematically replacing custom code with vendor-supported configurations. Others time major customization reduction with necessary upgrades, combining upgrade and modernization efforts. Still others implement parallel configurable systems, gradually migrating from legacy customized environments. The right approach depends on your specific situation, but action beats inaction. Every year maintaining heavily customized systems increases future migration costs while competitors advance with modern, flexible platforms. Take Control of Your PLM Future PLM customization and PLM implementation decisions made today determine your flexibility tomorrow. The difference between configurable and customized approaches isn’t just technical it’s strategic. Configurable systems adapt
Read More
The Growing Role of CAD in Smart City Design and Infrastructure Projects
Your PLM system should evolve with your business not trap it in place. Yet countless manufacturers discover this truth too late, when a seemingly simple software upgrade becomes a six-month ordeal requiring extensive code rewrites and threatening business continuity. The difference between configurable and customized PLM isn’t just technical semantics. It’s the difference between a system that grows with you and one that eventually holds you hostage. The Upgrade Lock-in Problem: A Growing Crisis Every year, PLM vendors release new versions packed with enhanced capabilities, security patches, and modern integrations. Your competitors adopt these improvements quickly, gaining efficiency advantages. Meanwhile, your team receives the dreaded news: “Our customizations aren’t compatible with the new version. Upgrading will take 8-12 months and cost $500,000.” This scenario plays out across manufacturing with alarming frequency. Companies invest heavily in PLM systems, customize them extensively to meet specific requirements, and then discover they’ve created upgrade barriers that grow more expensive with each passing version. The financial impact compounds over time: Beyond dollars, upgrade lock-in creates operational paralysis. Teams hesitate to modify processes because changes might complicate future upgrades. Innovation stalls. Business agility suffers. The system that should enable growth becomes a constraint. Why Heavy Customization Creates Technical Debt Understanding why PLM customization leads to upgrade lock-in req uires examining how customizations interact with core system architecture. When vendors release new versions, they modify underlying code, databases, and APIs. Extensive customizations built on the old foundation often break catastrophically. Core modifications are the biggest culprit. When customizations alter fundamental PLM objects, workflows, or data models, they create fragile dependencies. A vendor’s structural change can cascade through dozens of custom modules, requiring complete rewrites. Custom code lacks vendor support. During upgrades, vendors test and validate their standard functionality. Your custom code? That’s entirely your responsibility to fix, test, and validate. This burden grows exponentially with customization complexity. Integration points multiply maintenance. Custom integrations with ERP, CAD, and other systems often rely on specific API versions. Vendor upgrades frequently deprecate old APIs, forcing integration rewrites alongside core customization updates. Documentation gaps compound problems. Custom code written years ago by departed developers becomes a black box. Without proper documentation, even simple customization updates consume weeks of reverse-engineering effort during PLM implementation upgrades. The irony? Most heavy customizations address requirements that configurable solutions could have handled with proper PLM implementation planning. Configurable PLM: Built-in Flexibility Without the Baggage Modern configurable PLM platforms deliver extensive flexibility through vendor-supported mechanisms designed to survive upgrades. Understanding these capabilities transforms how manufacturers approach PLM customization decisions. Configuration tools provide powerful adaptation: These configuration capabilities handle 80-90% of typical “customization” requirements. The critical difference? Configurations remain vendor-supported through upgrades. The vendor tests configuration compatibility, provides migration tools, and ensures configurations survive version transitions. The upgrade advantage is transformative: Strategic PLM implementation leverages configuration first, reserving true customization for genuinely unique requirements that configuration cannot address. The Smart Customization Strategy: When and How to Customize Eliminating all PLM customization isn’t realistic or advisable. Some requirements genuinely exceed configuration capabilities. The key is distinguishing necessary customization from premature customization and implementing it with upgrade survivability in mind. Reserve customization for these scenarios: When customization is necessary, follow upgrade-friendly principles: Build through extensibility frameworks. Modern PLM platforms provide custom development frameworks designed for upgrade compatibility. These frameworks offer hooks, events, and APIs that remain stable across versions, allowing customizations to survive upgrades with minimal modification. Maintain strict separation from core code. Never modify vendor-supplied objects, workflows, or data models directly. Build separate custom modules that interact with the core through supported interfaces. This isolation prevents vendor changes from breaking your customizations. Document obsessively with future developers in mind. Every customization needs comprehensive documentation explaining business requirements, technical implementation, dependencies, and testing procedures. Future upgrade teams will thank you. Version control everything. Maintain complete revision history of all custom code, configurations, and documentation. This enables rapid assessment of what changed between versions and expedites upgrade testing. Plan upgrade testing from day one. Design customizations with testability in mind. Maintain automated test suites covering all custom functionality. This dramatically reduces validation time during actual upgrades. Thoughtful PLM customization balances current needs with long-term flexibility, ensuring your investment supports rather than constrains future growth. Implementation Strategy: Getting It Right From the Start The most effective time to prevent upgrade lock-in is during initial PLM implementation. Decisions made during deployment establish patterns that persist for years. Following a configuration-first methodology protects long-term flexibility while meeting immediate requirements. Phase 1: Requirements Analysis with Configuration Mapping Before writing a single line of custom code, exhaustively explore configuration capabilities: Many “must-have customizations” evaporate when configuration capabilities are fully understood and business processes adapt modestly. Phase 2: Configuration-First Implementation Implement all configuration-addressable requirements first: This approach delivers immediate value while maintaining upgrade flexibility. Teams gain experience with configuration tools, often discovering additional standard solutions for perceived customization needs. Phase 3: Selective, Strategic Customization For requirements genuinely exceeding configuration capabilities, implement minimal, focused customizations: Phase 4: Ongoing Governance Establish rigorous change management processes: Strong governance prevents customization creep that gradually recreates upgrade lock-in despite initial discipline. Moving Forward: Breaking Free from Lock-in If you’re already locked into a heavily customized PLM system, the path forward requires honest assessment and strategic action. Continuing with the status quo only deepens the problem as technical debt compounds with each postponed upgrade. Assessment starts with inventory: Remediation follows multiple paths: Some organizations undertake phased “de-customization” projects, systematically replacing custom code with vendor-supported configurations. Others time major customization reduction with necessary upgrades, combining upgrade and modernization efforts. Still others implement parallel configurable systems, gradually migrating from legacy customized environments. The right approach depends on your specific situation, but action beats inaction. Every year maintaining heavily customized systems increases future migration costs while competitors advance with modern, flexible platforms. Take Control of Your PLM Future PLM customization and PLM implementation decisions made today determine your flexibility tomorrow. The difference between configurable and customized approaches isn’t just technical it’s strategic. Configurable systems adapt
Read More
Configurable vs Customized PLM: How to Avoid Future Upgrade Lock-in
Your PLM system should evolve with your business not trap it in place. Yet countless manufacturers discover this truth too late, when a seemingly simple software upgrade becomes a six-month ordeal requiring extensive code rewrites and threatening business continuity. The difference between configurable and customized PLM isn’t just technical semantics. It’s the difference between a system that grows with you and one that eventually holds you hostage. The Upgrade Lock-in Problem: A Growing Crisis Every year, PLM vendors release new versions packed with enhanced capabilities, security patches, and modern integrations. Your competitors adopt these improvements quickly, gaining efficiency advantages. Meanwhile, your team receives the dreaded news: “Our customizations aren’t compatible with the new version. Upgrading will take 8-12 months and cost $500,000.” This scenario plays out across manufacturing with alarming frequency. Companies invest heavily in PLM systems, customize them extensively to meet specific requirements, and then discover they’ve created upgrade barriers that grow more expensive with each passing version. The financial impact compounds over time: Beyond dollars, upgrade lock-in creates operational paralysis. Teams hesitate to modify processes because changes might complicate future upgrades. Innovation stalls. Business agility suffers. The system that should enable growth becomes a constraint. Why Heavy Customization Creates Technical Debt Understanding why PLM customization leads to upgrade lock-in req uires examining how customizations interact with core system architecture. When vendors release new versions, they modify underlying code, databases, and APIs. Extensive customizations built on the old foundation often break catastrophically. Core modifications are the biggest culprit. When customizations alter fundamental PLM objects, workflows, or data models, they create fragile dependencies. A vendor’s structural change can cascade through dozens of custom modules, requiring complete rewrites. Custom code lacks vendor support. During upgrades, vendors test and validate their standard functionality. Your custom code? That’s entirely your responsibility to fix, test, and validate. This burden grows exponentially with customization complexity. Integration points multiply maintenance. Custom integrations with ERP, CAD, and other systems often rely on specific API versions. Vendor upgrades frequently deprecate old APIs, forcing integration rewrites alongside core customization updates. Documentation gaps compound problems. Custom code written years ago by departed developers becomes a black box. Without proper documentation, even simple customization updates consume weeks of reverse-engineering effort during PLM implementation upgrades. The irony? Most heavy customizations address requirements that configurable solutions could have handled with proper PLM implementation planning. Configurable PLM: Built-in Flexibility Without the Baggage Modern configurable PLM platforms deliver extensive flexibility through vendor-supported mechanisms designed to survive upgrades. Understanding these capabilities transforms how manufacturers approach PLM customization decisions. Configuration tools provide powerful adaptation: These configuration capabilities handle 80-90% of typical “customization” requirements. The critical difference? Configurations remain vendor-supported through upgrades. The vendor tests configuration compatibility, provides migration tools, and ensures configurations survive version transitions. The upgrade advantage is transformative: Strategic PLM implementation leverages configuration first, reserving true customization for genuinely unique requirements that configuration cannot address. The Smart Customization Strategy: When and How to Customize Eliminating all PLM customization isn’t realistic or advisable. Some requirements genuinely exceed configuration capabilities. The key is distinguishing necessary customization from premature customization and implementing it with upgrade survivability in mind. Reserve customization for these scenarios: When customization is necessary, follow upgrade-friendly principles: Build through extensibility frameworks. Modern PLM platforms provide custom development frameworks designed for upgrade compatibility. These frameworks offer hooks, events, and APIs that remain stable across versions, allowing customizations to survive upgrades with minimal modification. Maintain strict separation from core code. Never modify vendor-supplied objects, workflows, or data models directly. Build separate custom modules that interact with the core through supported interfaces. This isolation prevents vendor changes from breaking your customizations. Document obsessively with future developers in mind. Every customization needs comprehensive documentation explaining business requirements, technical implementation, dependencies, and testing procedures. Future upgrade teams will thank you. Version control everything. Maintain complete revision history of all custom code, configurations, and documentation. This enables rapid assessment of what changed between versions and expedites upgrade testing. Plan upgrade testing from day one. Design customizations with testability in mind. Maintain automated test suites covering all custom functionality. This dramatically reduces validation time during actual upgrades. Thoughtful PLM customization balances current needs with long-term flexibility, ensuring your investment supports rather than constrains future growth. Implementation Strategy: Getting It Right From the Start The most effective time to prevent upgrade lock-in is during initial PLM implementation. Decisions made during deployment establish patterns that persist for years. Following a configuration-first methodology protects long-term flexibility while meeting immediate requirements. Phase 1: Requirements Analysis with Configuration Mapping Before writing a single line of custom code, exhaustively explore configuration capabilities: Many “must-have customizations” evaporate when configuration capabilities are fully understood and business processes adapt modestly. Phase 2: Configuration-First Implementation Implement all configuration-addressable requirements first: This approach delivers immediate value while maintaining upgrade flexibility. Teams gain experience with configuration tools, often discovering additional standard solutions for perceived customization needs. Phase 3: Selective, Strategic Customization For requirements genuinely exceeding configuration capabilities, implement minimal, focused customizations: Phase 4: Ongoing Governance Establish rigorous change management processes: Strong governance prevents customization creep that gradually recreates upgrade lock-in despite initial discipline. Moving Forward: Breaking Free from Lock-in If you’re already locked into a heavily customized PLM system, the path forward requires honest assessment and strategic action. Continuing with the status quo only deepens the problem as technical debt compounds with each postponed upgrade. Assessment starts with inventory: Remediation follows multiple paths: Some organizations undertake phased “de-customization” projects, systematically replacing custom code with vendor-supported configurations. Others time major customization reduction with necessary upgrades, combining upgrade and modernization efforts. Still others implement parallel configurable systems, gradually migrating from legacy customized environments. The right approach depends on your specific situation, but action beats inaction. Every year maintaining heavily customized systems increases future migration costs while competitors advance with modern, flexible platforms. Take Control of Your PLM Future PLM customization and PLM implementation decisions made today determine your flexibility tomorrow. The difference between configurable and customized approaches isn’t just technical it’s strategic. Configurable systems adapt
Read MoreFeatured Posts
Table of content Evolution of Automotive Design: From Analog to Digital Realms Enabling Innovation: Pushing Boundaries of Creativity Enhancing Efficiency: Streamlining Design and Development Shaping...
Table of content Introduction What exactly is CAX software development? CAX Software: A Platform for Integration Tips and Best Practices for Efficient Design Conclusion Introduction The way engineers...
Table of content Introduction Understanding Business Process Automation Business Process Automation with CAD Streamlining Workflows with CAD: Success Stories Conclusion Introduction Industries across...
Allow us to help you!!
Prescient Technologies does not share or disclose your information to third parties. We value your privacy.